I am cognizant of a theoretical hypothetical situation that I could be a conscious being only interacting with a world that exists only in the past. That is the limitation of my interface with this world.
That this world that I know is of the past. As that I only exist in the past with regards to this world. My existence is only validated by the interaction of the world. And therefore, my existence is only in the past. This is in direct contrast to the existence of in the presence. This is not the aspect that I am revisiting history or just living in history but that I am in existence of the past. Subsequently, there is another group of beings that are experiencing the present.
Conversely, there can be an alternative world of existence that exists in the future. That I could be a being that exists in the future. And that my existence is only limited to the interface of everything that is in future. This would presume that there are other worlds of the past and present. This would be the relative world that we live in. These worlds would only be relative in time and not in thematerial world. Hypothetically speaking, that is. This gives rise to a myriad of thought about what perspectives this would impose on the existence. Do I live with the purpose of life in the frame set of the time relative that I exist in. That is if I live in the past then does all of my existence postulate that I am to relive the past or too learn everything there is to learn from the past that was skipped orlooked over?
Conversely, does living in the future mean to direct the path of the world? To give direction, purpose, and motive. Is this the driving force of the driving force? Is it that we drive the experiences we are to have because it is the time to experience them. Why is it we have the experiences that we do have at that time? (I not asking the question but posing the question.) Each experience has a purpose of existence for its time. Just for the sake of reference I dub this the 3T Dilation theory. For the three dimensions of Time. Now to mix this into the world in which we understand today. According to Einstein space and time are interconnected. In my theory they can not exist without each other. That is, space can not exist with out time and time can not exist with out space (and matter for purpose). According to Einstein in the vastness of space the space-time continuum is flat without distortion. As soon as matter is injecting into the space the space-time continuum is warped or altered. So, back to the theory at hand then that would mean there are three different time dimensions (past,present, and future) with respect to the material (space) world. That would mean there is actually nine different dimensions in time along with the three dimensions in time. Each world would have 4D or four dimensions, (X,Y,Z, t) multiplied by the three dimensions of time therefore making it 12 (3 x 4) dimensions. The three worlds would exist on a different Time dimension which therefore would phase shift the fundamental frequencies of matter. There would be the fundamental shift in the space-time continuum. This is, of course, a theoretical hypothetical thought experiment. Do the world simply and naturally phase shift from dimension to another?
I can assert very confidently that I am free of any mind altering drugs.Perception of reality is 9/10 of existence. The wonderment that causes thought. Is it the morphic resonance that cause us to share the same reality? Much like in Quantum physics when an observer observes a state of matter it causes it to collapse into one of its possible state. The morphic resonance holds this state ofexistence. I can't help but think about the classical proverb of 'If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound?' So what is the observance that holds this world in the state that it exists? We know that that mountain will still be there tomorrow. We are habitual to the knowledge that we will see that mountain tomorrow because we have learned from the past that that mountain was there each time. Does everything in this world exist in this time? Can we break the time continuum to traverse it? If we breach the time continuum then what are we really doing? That is, is it really time travel or phase shifting?
I am all too aware of that there are other theories/philosophy of time out there. Such as: http://www.qsmithwmu.com/philosophy_of_time.htm. I state for the record that I am neither disproving nor approving what other philosophies/theories there are out there. This is my vision, realization of philosophy of time. It may be subject to evolution itself.
Originally written on June 11, 2005.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
I am, We are Part of This Existence.
If we all have our different perspectives of reality then what is reality? Our reality is what we make of it. We are also delving into the understanding of why and how things work. From our observationswe construct our understanding of our perceptions of reality. Some people see different perspectives of the same reality. We have an insatiable drive to understand the world around us. What is it that provides our purpose in this reality. We are part of this reality. I am a conscience being in this reality, reacting with it, influencing it, responding to it. Why am I part of this reality? This is the question that is a different perspective of just the question why we are here. It is not that. I have been given the chance to be part of this reality as opposed to existing in nothing. How fortunate I feel. I am blessed to be part of this reality and coexist with it. I am neither outside this existence or inside it. I am part of it. To be part of it is to exist in myself. To exist as part of it. To exist in the present time. To share the same experiences with this world. With this people of today.
This was a result of an epiphany or realization at a spiritual level, not emanating from the intellect or logic. This was a feeling of realization that I fail to explain. I know that if I have felt it then there are others who have. This I know to be the truth of life and existence but I must through proper categorization put this into the philosophy of life.
This was a result of an epiphany or realization at a spiritual level, not emanating from the intellect or logic. This was a feeling of realization that I fail to explain. I know that if I have felt it then there are others who have. This I know to be the truth of life and existence but I must through proper categorization put this into the philosophy of life.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Random Muses of Synaptic Activity
There is so much to understand even just the things in this world. That we could spend all of our time here on this planet just understanding everything that this world has to offer. This is all ofeverything that we could spend our time thinking about. Understanding everything in this world is just one of the lifetime efforts one can spend on.
Also, there is that people also have the capability to imagine things that no one else has ever imagined. This is why it is so important to have art. To have that creative outlet to express ideas and concepts. To have this creative outlet in addition to the understanding of what is is within the realm of domain of knowledge. This domain of knowledge is boundless because of the imagination. But also it is boundless because our existence of this world is at a certain point of existence. There is more that can exist. Also, there is what has existed. There is also the further of the understanding of the sciences and everything present in our world today. The domain of knowledge is limitless beyond this world. The understanding of the physical world will lead to the understanding of the spiritual or thought world more in depth.
What is thought? Is thought an energy? Is thought beyond what our brains, neurons make it to be? Is thought tied to the knowledge realm thru the intelligence? Thought is intangible in the physical realm but very real in the thought or knowledge realm. Is the chain of existence for thought that there is thought, that what is which we think of in our minds, and that that thought is tied to the knowledge and the knowledge is tied to the intelligence or information in the information realm? Or is it that the thought is the representation of the intelligence, information in the information realm?
Like the philosopher Rene Descartes' "I think therefore I am" Is thought the manifestation of existence or is it the representation of intelligence or information from the information realm? Thought exists because of itself. This is like the brain is thinking about itself to become aware of itself. This would be like the computer processing information to become aware of itself.
Also, there is that people also have the capability to imagine things that no one else has ever imagined. This is why it is so important to have art. To have that creative outlet to express ideas and concepts. To have this creative outlet in addition to the understanding of what is is within the realm of domain of knowledge. This domain of knowledge is boundless because of the imagination. But also it is boundless because our existence of this world is at a certain point of existence. There is more that can exist. Also, there is what has existed. There is also the further of the understanding of the sciences and everything present in our world today. The domain of knowledge is limitless beyond this world. The understanding of the physical world will lead to the understanding of the spiritual or thought world more in depth.
What is thought? Is thought an energy? Is thought beyond what our brains, neurons make it to be? Is thought tied to the knowledge realm thru the intelligence? Thought is intangible in the physical realm but very real in the thought or knowledge realm. Is the chain of existence for thought that there is thought, that what is which we think of in our minds, and that that thought is tied to the knowledge and the knowledge is tied to the intelligence or information in the information realm? Or is it that the thought is the representation of the intelligence, information in the information realm?
Like the philosopher Rene Descartes' "I think therefore I am" Is thought the manifestation of existence or is it the representation of intelligence or information from the information realm? Thought exists because of itself. This is like the brain is thinking about itself to become aware of itself. This would be like the computer processing information to become aware of itself.
Natural to Scribe
There was no real driving force to compel me to write. It was just a natural transition to start doing this. Aside from the fact that I wish to do the obvious with this and share my muses. If I leave nothing else in this world past my death maybe I can provoke an evolution with those who choose to read the passages.
I can't help but think, am I forecasting my eventual passing? Is something from my sub-conscious or beyond compelling me to do this for reasons I am not yet aware of? Even so, my drive and motivation is not deterred. If I ponder for awhile I can see arguments for and against. One argument is to stop because this would stave off my eventual passing. Another argument is to continue and in fact speed it up because the impending transition is coming no matter what. However, I am confident that I have many passages to scribe before my time. A grain of salt, tongue and cheek.
My continuing may not be by offspring but maybe it will be by evolution. Evolution of thought and point of view.
Thank you.
I can't help but think, am I forecasting my eventual passing? Is something from my sub-conscious or beyond compelling me to do this for reasons I am not yet aware of? Even so, my drive and motivation is not deterred. If I ponder for awhile I can see arguments for and against. One argument is to stop because this would stave off my eventual passing. Another argument is to continue and in fact speed it up because the impending transition is coming no matter what. However, I am confident that I have many passages to scribe before my time. A grain of salt, tongue and cheek.
My continuing may not be by offspring but maybe it will be by evolution. Evolution of thought and point of view.
Thank you.
Monday, October 24, 2005
Dry Spirits
With the dryness of people I see that people are not necessarily turning to religion for answers. I saw a show on TV the other day that portrayed the confusion of why would God wreak such devastation on people. Particularly on seeming innocent people. This goes with the show on PBS of "The Question of God" Click Here. This is a perfect question to be asking now. How is it that if God where exacting this devastation on people then why? Maybe people are confused, almost as if they are being faced with a conundrum that is perplexing even the most dedicated people.
Why? This does not make sense for a God to exact on it creatures that God has created. I don't see people turning to religion for this. If anything they are confused. They have no where else to turn for answers.
I suspect that people will turn to something else for an answer. They will look to ghosts and phenomenon associated with ghosts. This may seem like a strange bed fellow but it is the closest tangible element to search into, coincidence of October aside. People are not finding their answers in religion, so they will turn to another source for answer. This is besides what science can answer. Because people look for a spiritual answer to what is going on.
The people need a gradual change away from the droning confines that religion has bestowed upon them. To evolve from one aspect to a completely different aspect takes many steps toward the other perspective of true spiritual awakening.
I have noticed that today's classical religions do not focus on the spiritual aspect of life. More it focuses on sin and governing rules of society on how and who to be. Not what the original massager intended in my opinion. It also does not talk about the ways in which to practice to establish and become aware of the connection that we have to life and the life energy. I'm not really sure that I can view the church as an authority on spiritual awareness and connection. Yes, they tell you extensively how on how to worship God but not how to honor him by being connected spiritually with him. If you believe in God. They have some aspects in which I agree but I also see many misinterpretations of the original message passed down. I think it is time for another deliverance of the true message. A message of how to really become aware and connected. There are some who are getting, practicing, and spreading the message on how to become aware.
I have noticed lately that there has been a lull in spiritual activity lately. It is more like an absence of spiritual activity possibly not just being absent of voluntary thought or practice but more of possibly of confusion or a challenge of faith.
I have been noticing people are moving away from religion. They are not going to church any more. Some have told me, "why go?" There are no answers that people can use. Or wish to use. The whole notion that you must repent your sins with the church is far too controlling of a factor to deal with. From this I am seeing an evolutionary step towards thinking more for themselves.
Because of this I was inclined to do a little research, for what value it holds, to discover how much people are going to church.
After searching on Google for the phase "decline attendance church going population".
We are seeing a steady decline in people going to church. The following are articles pertaining to that:
How Many Americans Really Attend Church Each Week?
Is New Zealand’s Future Churchless??
Mission fields are no longer in Africa, but in Scotland
Study into the reasons for decline in church attendance
Church attendance on the decline
By far the most credible answer to people’s lack of church attendance is due to the ever increasing demand of work, children, and maintaining home. Particularly that both of the parents are working. This would also call for a poll for those of us who not in the married, married with kids realm.
Not by any means am I insinuating that people are declining in church because of the lack of faith or confusion. It is interesting to see the trend and to also see that people are becoming more confused about the question of God. I have heard other people reporting that they find it easy to be agnostic or atheist. This is some what surprising to me, but even as I ponder on the incredible thought process that has converted them to think this way is a sign of emergence from the control of classical religion.
For the results of the phrase "decrease attendance church going population":
Church, Lies, and Polling Data
Why I Quit Going To Church
In all fairness and in the realm of a true balanced measurement, I can not really call this a true scientific measurement, since I have not actually done the polls myself, it would be inconceivable not to do a search on the incline of church going people. So, the search was also included by the phrase "increase attendance church going population". The result ended up with approxiamately the same results from the first search on the decline of population. I was hoping to at least see something...
I know people who used to attend regularly are now turning their attention elsewhere. Now one could say that because we are seeing a change in society and our culture of that both parents in a typical family have to work to keep the expensive "American Dream" alive. Between working, taking care of the kids and not to mention the house there is no time to go to church. But is that really the reason why people are declining to go to church. This may be one of the several reasons why. I think we are seeing a desperate plea with the public particularly with the conservative religions to get people back. They can see that attendance is declining and they are desperate to hold onto what little power they have.
Questions for people on what their views are of religion and going to church.
1. Do you consider yourself a religious person?
2. Do you go to church every week?
3. What is your position on religion?
4. Do you think the classical religions have a strong connection with every day life?
5. Would you identify yourself with a religious sect? (Without naming it.)
What a time we live in, for if I where to publish say 100 or more years ago I would have most likely been persecuted and even executed for this blasphemous words.
Originally written on October 14, 2005
Why? This does not make sense for a God to exact on it creatures that God has created. I don't see people turning to religion for this. If anything they are confused. They have no where else to turn for answers.
I suspect that people will turn to something else for an answer. They will look to ghosts and phenomenon associated with ghosts. This may seem like a strange bed fellow but it is the closest tangible element to search into, coincidence of October aside. People are not finding their answers in religion, so they will turn to another source for answer. This is besides what science can answer. Because people look for a spiritual answer to what is going on.
The people need a gradual change away from the droning confines that religion has bestowed upon them. To evolve from one aspect to a completely different aspect takes many steps toward the other perspective of true spiritual awakening.
I have noticed that today's classical religions do not focus on the spiritual aspect of life. More it focuses on sin and governing rules of society on how and who to be. Not what the original massager intended in my opinion. It also does not talk about the ways in which to practice to establish and become aware of the connection that we have to life and the life energy. I'm not really sure that I can view the church as an authority on spiritual awareness and connection. Yes, they tell you extensively how on how to worship God but not how to honor him by being connected spiritually with him. If you believe in God. They have some aspects in which I agree but I also see many misinterpretations of the original message passed down. I think it is time for another deliverance of the true message. A message of how to really become aware and connected. There are some who are getting, practicing, and spreading the message on how to become aware.
I have noticed lately that there has been a lull in spiritual activity lately. It is more like an absence of spiritual activity possibly not just being absent of voluntary thought or practice but more of possibly of confusion or a challenge of faith.
I have been noticing people are moving away from religion. They are not going to church any more. Some have told me, "why go?" There are no answers that people can use. Or wish to use. The whole notion that you must repent your sins with the church is far too controlling of a factor to deal with. From this I am seeing an evolutionary step towards thinking more for themselves.
Because of this I was inclined to do a little research, for what value it holds, to discover how much people are going to church.
After searching on Google for the phase "decline attendance church going population".
We are seeing a steady decline in people going to church. The following are articles pertaining to that:
How Many Americans Really Attend Church Each Week?
Is New Zealand’s Future Churchless??
Mission fields are no longer in Africa, but in Scotland
Study into the reasons for decline in church attendance
Church attendance on the decline
By far the most credible answer to people’s lack of church attendance is due to the ever increasing demand of work, children, and maintaining home. Particularly that both of the parents are working. This would also call for a poll for those of us who not in the married, married with kids realm.
Not by any means am I insinuating that people are declining in church because of the lack of faith or confusion. It is interesting to see the trend and to also see that people are becoming more confused about the question of God. I have heard other people reporting that they find it easy to be agnostic or atheist. This is some what surprising to me, but even as I ponder on the incredible thought process that has converted them to think this way is a sign of emergence from the control of classical religion.
For the results of the phrase "decrease attendance church going population":
Church, Lies, and Polling Data
Why I Quit Going To Church
In all fairness and in the realm of a true balanced measurement, I can not really call this a true scientific measurement, since I have not actually done the polls myself, it would be inconceivable not to do a search on the incline of church going people. So, the search was also included by the phrase "increase attendance church going population". The result ended up with approxiamately the same results from the first search on the decline of population. I was hoping to at least see something...
I know people who used to attend regularly are now turning their attention elsewhere. Now one could say that because we are seeing a change in society and our culture of that both parents in a typical family have to work to keep the expensive "American Dream" alive. Between working, taking care of the kids and not to mention the house there is no time to go to church. But is that really the reason why people are declining to go to church. This may be one of the several reasons why. I think we are seeing a desperate plea with the public particularly with the conservative religions to get people back. They can see that attendance is declining and they are desperate to hold onto what little power they have.
Questions for people on what their views are of religion and going to church.
1. Do you consider yourself a religious person?
2. Do you go to church every week?
3. What is your position on religion?
4. Do you think the classical religions have a strong connection with every day life?
5. Would you identify yourself with a religious sect? (Without naming it.)
What a time we live in, for if I where to publish say 100 or more years ago I would have most likely been persecuted and even executed for this blasphemous words.
Originally written on October 14, 2005
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Zero Energy Abyss
In the middle of the night awoken, with an immediate feeling of loneliness. A very strong feeling of loneliness, like I am only being in existence in this world. Imagine that you are in the vastness of space with no planet around for thousands of light years. A vast blackness surrounds your every existence. An vast emptiness of no energy, no light, no matter. My existence fades to nothing because of my absence in the collective conscious of all living beings. Wading in the realm of the forgotten. Floating in vast void of space.
There is one object that is there, a matt black featureless giant hand. Like a claw it is the size of myself much like it was designed for me specifically. It is my imprisonment. It moves with a slow steady un-alarming pace. As it grasps me its effects of suffocating oppression are felt unequally. It has infinite patience to await for my visit. Not bound by space and time it does not exist within the realm of time. It is absent of malice, anger, sadness, or greed. Is is not happy to do so. It merely is. It is absent of any human emotion that we as a species tend to project onto an object. Its sole purpose is to drain the life energy from you. It does that with efficiency and purpose of its value in existence. Like water pouring out of a dam I can feel my life energy being sapped away, 100, 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001... There is the absence of conservation of life energy here. It is an energy pit in which energy is dissipated and never reclaimed. So effective is it to focus my attention on it only it. For myself to focus on anything else would cause the existence of material world to come into existence. And its existence would fade within its own void. Everything in life is relative. Except this is absolute within the absolute scale of all existence. It is anti-energy. As in the material world there is matter and anti-matter. When the matter and anti-matter collide they annihilate into nothing with a little amount of energy given off. This is the existence of anti-energy in opposite of the energy that permeates this world and the life energy that animates all living things. Not to posit that this is a scientific aspect but to understand what it is.
It is Zero Energy the reference point of life and the existence of this world.
It is not my enemy, it is it is something I know all to well. I must face it as well as I wish to face it. For it is demand put on myself to absolve myself of it. I and only I can have the initiative to divert its existence. Morning comes and the life giving energy of the sun light is a welcome threshold. It is the light that gives life. There is dawn of a new day to give rise to the purpose of existence in life. The day is a placeholder for the purpose of life and its existence. I am here to allocate that placeholder.
It is there, avoided for now temporarily, but its patience is infinite and it waits. I will be ready but I do not want to go.
Do you know what this is? Have you experienced it? I imagine that all of us at one point and time have. Therefore, I wish to bring it into the collective consciousness. To bring it into the collective consciousness is to give it existence. To give it an energy of existence to fill its void. In an effort to annihilate it.
There is one object that is there, a matt black featureless giant hand. Like a claw it is the size of myself much like it was designed for me specifically. It is my imprisonment. It moves with a slow steady un-alarming pace. As it grasps me its effects of suffocating oppression are felt unequally. It has infinite patience to await for my visit. Not bound by space and time it does not exist within the realm of time. It is absent of malice, anger, sadness, or greed. Is is not happy to do so. It merely is. It is absent of any human emotion that we as a species tend to project onto an object. Its sole purpose is to drain the life energy from you. It does that with efficiency and purpose of its value in existence. Like water pouring out of a dam I can feel my life energy being sapped away, 100, 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001... There is the absence of conservation of life energy here. It is an energy pit in which energy is dissipated and never reclaimed. So effective is it to focus my attention on it only it. For myself to focus on anything else would cause the existence of material world to come into existence. And its existence would fade within its own void. Everything in life is relative. Except this is absolute within the absolute scale of all existence. It is anti-energy. As in the material world there is matter and anti-matter. When the matter and anti-matter collide they annihilate into nothing with a little amount of energy given off. This is the existence of anti-energy in opposite of the energy that permeates this world and the life energy that animates all living things. Not to posit that this is a scientific aspect but to understand what it is.
It is Zero Energy the reference point of life and the existence of this world.
It is not my enemy, it is it is something I know all to well. I must face it as well as I wish to face it. For it is demand put on myself to absolve myself of it. I and only I can have the initiative to divert its existence. Morning comes and the life giving energy of the sun light is a welcome threshold. It is the light that gives life. There is dawn of a new day to give rise to the purpose of existence in life. The day is a placeholder for the purpose of life and its existence. I am here to allocate that placeholder.
It is there, avoided for now temporarily, but its patience is infinite and it waits. I will be ready but I do not want to go.
Do you know what this is? Have you experienced it? I imagine that all of us at one point and time have. Therefore, I wish to bring it into the collective consciousness. To bring it into the collective consciousness is to give it existence. To give it an energy of existence to fill its void. In an effort to annihilate it.
Sunday, October 16, 2005
Initial Reflections, Scribe for the Scroll
If one looks at history the papyrus was one of the first real mass communication mechanisms. We must learn from our history for it is one of the fundamental foundations of our evolution. On that day that we pass away our words will be no more. But, one day, someone will find our papyrus in hopes that our experience will be the foundation in which future generations will learn from. Is it the notion that our children should learn from what we have learned and exceed beyond that. So that our experiences will provide a basis on which our children can start from and learn even more. To evolve. To raise the bar for even their children.
If we forget our history its existence fades to absence in this physical realm. Though it is contained within the domain of information energy.
Is it not important to learn our history? Is it not important to pass it on?
If we forget our history its existence fades to absence in this physical realm. Though it is contained within the domain of information energy.
Is it not important to learn our history? Is it not important to pass it on?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)