Sunday, October 30, 2005

3T Dilation Theory of Time

I am cognizant of a theoretical hypothetical situation that I could be a conscious being only interacting with a world that exists only in the past. That is the limitation of my interface with this world.
That this world that I know is of the past. As that I only exist in the past with regards to this world. My existence is only validated by the interaction of the world. And therefore, my existence is only in the past. This is in direct contrast to the existence of in the presence. This is not the aspect that I am revisiting history or just living in history but that I am in existence of the past. Subsequently, there is another group of beings that are experiencing the present.
Conversely, there can be an alternative world of existence that exists in the future. That I could be a being that exists in the future. And that my existence is only limited to the interface of everything that is in future. This would presume that there are other worlds of the past and present. This would be the relative world that we live in. These worlds would only be relative in time and not in thematerial world. Hypothetically speaking, that is. This gives rise to a myriad of thought about what perspectives this would impose on the existence. Do I live with the purpose of life in the frame set of the time relative that I exist in. That is if I live in the past then does all of my existence postulate that I am to relive the past or too learn everything there is to learn from the past that was skipped orlooked over?
Conversely, does living in the future mean to direct the path of the world? To give direction, purpose, and motive. Is this the driving force of the driving force? Is it that we drive the experiences we are to have because it is the time to experience them. Why is it we have the experiences that we do have at that time? (I not asking the question but posing the question.) Each experience has a purpose of existence for its time. Just for the sake of reference I dub this the 3T Dilation theory. For the three dimensions of Time. Now to mix this into the world in which we understand today. According to Einstein space and time are interconnected. In my theory they can not exist without each other. That is, space can not exist with out time and time can not exist with out space (and matter for purpose). According to Einstein in the vastness of space the space-time continuum is flat without distortion. As soon as matter is injecting into the space the space-time continuum is warped or altered. So, back to the theory at hand then that would mean there are three different time dimensions (past,present, and future) with respect to the material (space) world. That would mean there is actually nine different dimensions in time along with the three dimensions in time. Each world would have 4D or four dimensions, (X,Y,Z, t) multiplied by the three dimensions of time therefore making it 12 (3 x 4) dimensions. The three worlds would exist on a different Time dimension which therefore would phase shift the fundamental frequencies of matter. There would be the fundamental shift in the space-time continuum. This is, of course, a theoretical hypothetical thought experiment. Do the world simply and naturally phase shift from dimension to another?
I can assert very confidently that I am free of any mind altering drugs.Perception of reality is 9/10 of existence. The wonderment that causes thought. Is it the morphic resonance that cause us to share the same reality? Much like in Quantum physics when an observer observes a state of matter it causes it to collapse into one of its possible state. The morphic resonance holds this state ofexistence. I can't help but think about the classical proverb of 'If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound?' So what is the observance that holds this world in the state that it exists? We know that that mountain will still be there tomorrow. We are habitual to the knowledge that we will see that mountain tomorrow because we have learned from the past that that mountain was there each time. Does everything in this world exist in this time? Can we break the time continuum to traverse it? If we breach the time continuum then what are we really doing? That is, is it really time travel or phase shifting?

I am all too aware of that there are other theories/philosophy of time out there. Such as: http://www.qsmithwmu.com/philosophy_of_time.htm. I state for the record that I am neither disproving nor approving what other philosophies/theories there are out there. This is my vision, realization of philosophy of time. It may be subject to evolution itself.
Originally written on June 11, 2005.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It's tough to define the concept of time without using "time" in the definition.